Housing is a Civil Right

Housing is a Civil Right

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Say Wisconsin Lawyers Terry E. Johnson and Mark W. Rattan are a Couple of Goddamn Liars.


Back Story One

Back Story Two.

And they had the nerve to call me "sleazy" in their filings.  That's a Good One. I expose corruption and dirty lawyers. Now we see who the real sleazebuckets are.


Wait a minute. Johnson is on an OLR Review Committee. I just wrote everyone noting as much. He is right there with Paul Schwarzenbart, the lawyer from OLR who triggered my ejectment in the first place. They are all in bed together, at least I called it before they screw me further.  

^+^+^+^+^+^+^

Re: The Association between Terry Johnson and the OLR 
1 minute ago at 1:48 PM 
From Christopher King 
To "Terry E. Johnson" 

That's funny. No smart-aleck response from Terry this time. For shame, I was starting to miss them. ---Barbara Streisand's "People" plays in background--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPlQ6EtArSc

That's worth a laugh for Terry and Paul at their next Tee-Time or beer, right. 

"Hey Paul -- can you believe the nerve of that uppity negro coming up in here and tipping at the apple cart?" 

"Yah I know Terry. Plucky sort isn't he." 

 I look forward to all of the Decisions in this matter. 
 Ciao guys. 

 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.

Sunday, September 17, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Karen Pooley Succeed in Foreclosure Reconsideration; Issue Complaints Regarding Attorney Richard L. Jones, Esq.



Below is the draft post that I sent to both parties for review. Below are Attorney Jones' comments in response to my initial inquiry. He declined to provide the salient portion of the divorce decree that addresses what articles he believed he could lawfully retrieve from his former home when he was charged with a theft offense and took an Alford Plea. The matter was eventually expunged. I will publish that later today, 18 September 2017.

1. These are matters of public record. 

2. My original plea is a matter of public record. 
3. I believe the Court found the picture more compelling than the height and weight description. The court acted ex parte – I wasn’t at the hearing in which Ms. Pooley attempted to have the default judgment set aside. So, I just don’t know. 
4. There was a mediation. 
5. Ms. Pooley was well in arrears when I commenced work on the appeal. Please see my billing statements, previously provided. 
6. My fees did increase from $280 to $320, but Ms. Pooley’s fees were increased as provided in the Retainer Agreement. 
7. No, I didn’t urinate in a can in front of anyone, although I have had prostate issues in the recent past that have been corrected with surgery. 

*************

Christopher King Re: Removal of SCRIBD document -- 
KingCast/Mortgage Movies Pooley/Jones coverage 
1 minute ago at 1:31 PM 
From Christopher King To Richard Jones Karen Pooley 

Dear Attorney Jones: There is no prohibition against publishing an expunged criminal record in Washington State. Did you or your office or any representative of you or your office cause any of my documents to be removed from SCRIBD? That is a yes or no question. 

 In the event I do not hear from you by 4pm today I will assume that you or your agents were responsible for the removal and I shall take action accordingly. 

 Very Truly Yours,
Seattle Homeowner Fights Attorney Over Botched Foreclosure Defense by christopher king on Scribd
 
This is a difficult piece for me to write. As you can see by the thumbnails below I have published many stories and videos relative to the case of Quality Loan Servicing Inc. (QLSC) v. Karen Pooley. Richard L. Jones was her attorney for some of this case, until there was a substantial disagreement on billing and representation that led to Jones suing Pooley and obtaining a Default Judgment against her as she denied ever receiving service. 

Ms. Pooley and her friend both issued sworn Affidavits that a process server "served" her friend on a dark night in February, 2016 as she was walking Ms. Pooley's dog.


Meanwhile Pooley, a knowledgeable and well-educated pro se litigant, lost her primary case and wrote most of her own Appellate Brief with Jones overlooking, and a Motion for Reconsideration after the Court of Appeals Division One ruled against her on or about 15 August, 2017.  The Court ORDERED a substantive response from from QLSC, McCarthy Holthus et al. on or about 15 September 2017. They Court ordered a response within 15 days.


She contends that the $20,000.00 Judgment that Jones obtained is the product of Unjust Enrichment. She may file ethics charges as well. Jones has been subject to ethical considerations in the past, leading to his removal as pro tem Judge in 2007 according to the Seattle Times.


For the purposes of this discussion attached a copy of what I drafted as the copy for this story, along with the responses from Ms. Pooley, who as also agreed to go on video.  Attorney Jones declined to respond directly to my last letter and stated that he did not receive Ms. Pooley's responses.  In turn, I responded to him noting that she had sent her responses to both of us at 3:40pm on 15 September 2017.


Here are the last two relevant emails between all three of us, below the Draft post I circulated to them on or about 14 September, 2017 as seen immediately below:


**********



From: Christopher King [mailto:kingcast955@icloud.com]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 2:14 PM
To: Karen Pooley <pooleykaren@yahoo.com>; Richard Jones <rlj@kovacandjones.com>
Subject: Draft Publication.

Dear Karen and Richard:

Richard asked me about the CoA status a few days ago. Since that status changed Ms. Pooley has expressed to me that it bolsters her entire position and she feels that Richard is not entitled to the Judgment obtained in the Default Judgment.

At this point I am feeling more like a mediator than a journalist so I can't do anything more with this story besides a voiceover.  

I do welcome both of you to speak your mind on video at your earliest convenience.

As to my $.02 I think y'all need to reach an extrajudicial resolution.

Sincerely, 

Christopher King, J.D. 


***********

Re: Draft Publication.
2 days ago at 3:45 PM

From
To
Reply-To
Christopher,

While you have most of the story correct, there are a few details which are incorrect.  Please allow me to correct my allegations of the record:

1) Mr. Jones' failed to check the docket on TWO occasions:  a) failed to acknowledge opposition responded to my Partial SJ, causing me to miss a Reply to my Partial Summary Judgment; and b) failed to verify that all documents were indeed filed in the lower court.  The lower court apparently rejected his offices' filing of our Response to Opposition's SJ, causing me to spend almost a YEAR's worth of attorney fees correcting the lower court record.   Jones billed all this to me.  At one point, he claimed I had spent $5000 rectifying the record, but it was much more than that.  This is the major point of contention.  I spent THOUSANDS of attorney's fees correcting HIS offices mistake.  Had they checked and verified the docket, they would have noticed a TWO THOUSAND PAGE discrepancy!!!

2) Jones charged $3500 for a mediation that was non-existent.  If Jones' claims this was ADR, this is also FALSE.  ADR never occurred.  And had it, I would have written the check directly to the mediator, not Jones' office!

3) In his complaint against me for fees claimed uncollected, he admits THERE WAS NO RETAINER AGREEMENT.  For him now to claim the retainer alludes to a fee raise, this is just a flat out LIE.  In addition, if you look at the documents he submitted to court, the fees after the FIRST HOUR were billed at $325.  Does anyone believe I would agree to the first hour billed at the agreed upon fee and then tell him, "yeah, go ahead and give yourself a raise."  Uh no.  In fact, I have submitted to the court emails showing that I never received any Jones' statements on a regular basis.

4) Opening brief was written largely by myself, and modified by Jones.  I was the one who found that opposing counsel submitted all the documents attached to her declaration FROM THE INTERNET.  I asked Jones if we could bring up hearsay for the first time on appeal.  He said "Absolutely."  Yet, I investigated that.  Hearsay on appeal is only observed by the panel AT THEIR DISCRETION if brought up for the first time on appeal.  What attorney cannot identify HEARSAY, for God's sakes!?!

5)  The demand for the $8000 came when I was writing the Appellate Reply brief.  I was shocked as his demand letter said he acknowledged my regularly providing $2000 per month on a regular basis and this practice was accepted.  Yet, his $8000 demand right before Appellate Reply was a dereliction of his fiduciary duties.  Violation of his RPCs and felt very much like extortion.


Karen Pooley 
206.xxx.xxxx



"It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."- Justice Robert H. Jackson

Saturday, July 15, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Say Klein v. Litchfield, Cavo 15-CV-03646 (SDNY) is Proof of Corporate Pig Sexism in Addition to the Racism in KingCast v. Mark W. Rattan.

Well folks we saw in this journal entry and Bar Complaint how Litchfield, Cavo Partner Mark W. Rattan attacked my stationary camera and me during a disciplinary hearing against foreclosure defense attorney Wendy Alison Nora.





When I filed my Bar Complaint with the Office of Lawyer Regulation they hired another stiff white male, Terry L. Johnson to defend. Johnson sets out on the war path, attacking each and everything in my past even though my skirmishes with various corporate and state entities always ended on a positive note for me, or demonstrating liability for employment violations or racism or First Amendment violations on their part. You can read about that in my reply at bottom but today we are here to discuss the theory that those in glass houses..... might now want to throw stones:

The simple fact of the matter is that Litchfield, Cavo have been sued in Federal Court for being sexist pigs so that fits perfectly into this puzzle, along with Wells Fargo hired Counsel walking around calling people who look like Petitioner “niggers.”


Klein v. Litchfield, Cavo 15-CV-03646, Cavo as reported by Above the Law, here is my email to the Office of Lawyer Regulation, Johnson and others:


Yah if we want to play that game let's talk about a Name Partner and his sexism shall we? http://abovethelaw.com/2015/05/so-i-cant-tell-my-associate-to-do-more-to-satisfy-her-husband/ 

On that subject, another way to get to know your employees is to spend some time with their family. Defendant Eckert also discussed Plaintiff Klein’s sex life with her husband and said 

“I feel your pain, I don’t know how you’re married to Bari.” 

While each day the conversation would begin relating to work, Defendant Eckert would inevitably bring the conversation to relate to Plaintiff Klein’s personal life. Those conversations included questions about how often Plaintiff Klein had sex with her husband, how it felt to have sex in her parents’ home, why Plaintiff Klein did not have sex more often and asking if plaintiff Klein would ever cheat on her husband. 

 ********* 
Apparently, Klein didn’t appreciate all this alleged great advice and asked her firm to do something about it. As Law 360 reports: Klein regularly told the firm’s partners about Eckert’s behavior, saying she felt she was being treated differently because of her gender, but nothing was done to improve the situation, according to the complaint. 

Klein had a “severe” panic attack one day in the office, but the firm did not call for an ambulance until Klein’s mother, who learned what happened, called one of the partners and demanded that her daughter be taken to the hospital. By firing Klein only five days after she returned from her FMLA leave, it will be difficult for Litchfield Cavo to argue that the two are not connected, her attorney, Jesse Rose, told Law 360 Tuesday. 

***********

But see, it wasn’t retaliation, the firm just thought she needed more time to recover and… yeah, I can’t push this pretense any more. Klein seeks compensatory and punitive damages of an unspecified amount and Litchfield Cavo and Eckert have a pretty dismal set of allegations to overcome. 

........I suppose this is all my fault as well? The fact of the matter is, in my 52 years on this planet as a black man sensitive to the concerns of all minorities and people of moderate to lower-incomes (including many white males) I have come to know the presence of Hegemony, Racism, Sexism and that progeny of social anathema. Consider it as parallel to the Miller Test for obscenity, 

"I know it when I see it." 

And so it should come to pass that with a few key strokes in PACER I uncover this gem, fomented by another PARTNER. That corporate sickness trickles down folks, and it trickles right on down the tops of the heads of people like Mark W. Rattan, but not on my watch it doesn't. I have a history of exposing corruption and it is not about to stop now. Apparently I should have been spending more time in PACER to learn about nasty white men and the nasty white men who defend them. This one is going up on the blog and into the public SCRIBD document later today. 

Ciao.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

28 June 2017 KingCast and Mortgage Movies Reflect on Police Abuse, Kathleen O'Toole's Bookend Police Killings and the Shame of Charleena Lyles' Homicide.

 

City City Council and Kathleen O'Toole have tapped into a keg of Political Whup Ass.
This is actually good for the city; a wake up call that cannot be ignored.

Emotions are high and they SHOULD be high because these emotions are distended from years of oppression and government malfeasance, outright abuse. I have video of last evening's public hearing on this police slaying but I am not certain which portions of it I am entitled to use just yet.



I know about police abuse, having nailed Hamilton, OH bad cop Richard Hensley for assaulting a black motorist back in the '90s, and he continued on his path for many years. Frankly I bear no compunction to say "I told you so."


I also know about Boston Police under the auspices of Kathleen O'Toole. I've been waiting to share how former Boston Fire Captain James Berlo was targeted by BFD and BPD after he blew the whistle on racism in his department. A video of BPD illegally trespassing (that's redundant I guess) at his home down in Quincy -- out of jurisdiction -- somehow disappeared from YouTube with 7,000 local views but I put it right back up. I lived in New England for 13 years so you can't fool me. Been there done that and Mumbles Menino was a Chief Architect of Oppression, yes he was. 

Then we come to the $5M settlement in the Victoria Snelgrove shooting while I was living there, and please note that her shooting was accidental. As I recall the police were using low impact weapons and a knee-knocker skipped up and struck her in the head or something. Close enough, trust me I know I'm right without even looking it up.  To the contrary, however, Ms. Lyles homicide was imminently foreseeable. 

As to this case, I already know enough to know that at least one of the officers involved failed to bring his lesser impact weapon to the home of Charleena Lyles, and that is why she is dead today. It is a shame that Chief O'Toole's career is going to be somewhat book-ended by these shootings, the first one understandable as it was.  She does herself no favors by ducking out on last night's meeting so I am going to take this opportunity to expose all of this for the American and World Public to see.

********

PS: Let's not get into the history of Seattle City Council ignoring important things my people have brought to them, including their refusal to bring Marie McDonnell in to discuss MERS mortgage fraud she found in King County pursuant to her hired task as forensic specialist/auditor, paid for by the taxpayers of course. And of course never mind that Multnomah and other jurisdictions in Oregon have successfully sued MERS over this very issue. Of course never mind that many of these same city councilors attended a forum I helped arrange to discuss mortgage fraud, foreclosure fraud and underwater homes four years ago




Promises, Promises.....

Thursday, May 25, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Inform NYTimes Reporters Corkery and Protess that Citibank Mexican Money Laundering is Old Hat.



Dear Reporters Corkery and Protess,

Thank you for your coverage of the current scandal.
I am forwarding this to Twitter, FB and to Attorney Sam Shaulson with glee as I crack the biggest smile this morning. You see, I was a reporter for a large midwestern daily prior to law school so I figured you would get a kick out of this: The Salinas Affair (as depicted in the thumbnail).  I discovered all of this after a local Citibank manager wrongfully dishonored a check that was held by another man of color after I had helped him sue the shit out of a jackass lawyer named Jeffrey Denner.  Anyway, Google KingCast + Sam Shaulson, Esq. for shits and grins. He is pictured, above, next to the dirty dead rat, which is precisely where he belongs. Well not physically dead, but yes morally dead, and a rat indeed. In fact, I still have an entire blog dedicated to Citibank malfeasance even though I've not posted in it for six (6) years I keep it around because everything old.... is new again. See the excerpt below as I prove my point.

In fact, while some may not engage in Mexican drug money laundering all of the major banks are largely corrupt, and I say this having worked for a few of them as a residential closing attorney. I see it now as a mortgage consultant. Welcome to the downfall of Western Civilization folks.

******

Almost every multinational banking scam involves Citibank. I've been listing Enron, Ohio, California, Mexico, Russia and some of the others here and at Citibankisracist blog, but now here is yet another case closer to home and ongoing even. I have notified the authors of this 2009 Wall Street Journal story, "Citi, SEC Are in Talks to Settle Asset Probe." I'll tell you whose assets are getting probed: Those of the American Public if you catch my drift.
"Citigroup Inc. is in the early stages of negotiating with the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle an investigation into whether it misled investors by not properly disclosing the amount of troubled mortgage assets it held as the market began to implode in 2007, people familiar with the matter say.

Among issues being debated inside the SEC is whether, as a recipient of government-rescue funds, Citigroup should pay a large penalty in the case. There is concern at the SEC about the notion of financial firms in effect using taxpayer money to pay penalties, people close to the situation say. Citigroup received $45 billion from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program and plans to raise an additional $5.5 billion in capital from private investors."
Shaulson_SEC_Mortgage_Enron_hijab_Memorandum.doc.

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Pierce County Judge of the Year at odds with Defendant Stanley J. Rumbaugh on Free Press.


Update on the underlying case: Fascinating that the area Judge of the Year Frank E. Cuthbertson makes the right call when addressing a media request but Judge Rumbaugh and his attorneys sit around and tell lies while the Federal Court protects them.


A principled Jurist who evaluates media requests and responds accordingly……

In direct opposition to Stanley Rumbaugh,a hegemonic warlord who treats alternative press with a measure of contempt reserved for one’s mortal enemy.

Google KingCast, Wally Brown and Chris Nubbe v. Stanley J. Rumbaugh.  Defendant Rumbaugh ran off to a sympathetic federal court on an improvident removal but we are going to the 9th Circuit and beyond for violations of Washington State GR 16.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Rumbaugh.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Ricardo S. Martinez in Federal as well, see below.



Federal Judge Ricardo S. Martinez allowed Counsel for Defendant Stanley J. Rumbaugh to lie about material aspects of a Free Press First Amendment case after Defendant Rumbaugh repeatedly violated Washington GR 16 that presupposes news media are to be GRANTED ACCESS to Courts. 

The Defendants and this Judge completely lied in the Record to find that none of us presented as media to the Defendant before he refused camera access, then when I filed a Notice of Fraud and a Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions this Judge dismissed them out of hand so that the dirty State lawyers wouldn't even have to argue anything.

This case will move on toward the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and beyond, on the issue of whether granting or denying access to reporters is an Administrative or Judicial Function. 

This Judge of course never once mentioned the words "Administratvie Function" in his purported analysis of the case.

And yes it is a shame that taxpayers subsidize his income as well as that of the dirty state Judge and that of his lawyers as well.... Mark Lindquist's Office is notoriously dirty, just Google it.

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: Official Judicial Complaint Against Free Press Hater Judge Ricardo S. Martinez in 2:17-cv-00031-RSM King J.D. et al v. Rumbaugh.

Update on the underlying case: Fascinating that the area Judge of the Year makes the right call when addressing a media request but Judge Rumbaugh and his attorneys sit around and tell lies while the Federal Court protects them.


A principled Jurist who evaluates media requests and responds accordingly……

In direct opposition to Stanley Rumbaugh,a hegemonic warlord who treats alternative press with a measure of contempt reserved for one’s mortal enemy.

Google KingCast, Wally Brown and Chris Nubbe v. Stanley J. Rumbaugh.  Defendant Rumbaugh ran off to a sympathetic federal court on an improvident removal but we are going to the 9th Circuit and beyond for violations of Washington State GR 16.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Rumbaugh.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Ricardo S. Martinez in Federal as well.



Federal Judge Ricardo S. Martinez allowed Counsel for Defendant Stanley J. Rumbaugh to lie about material aspects of a Free Press First Amendment case after Defendant Rumbaugh repeatedly violated Washington GR 16 that presupposes news media are to be GRANTED ACCESS to Courts. 

The Defendants and this Judge completely lied in the Record to find that none of us presented as media to the Defendant before he refused camera access, then when I filed a Notice of Fraud and a Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions this Judge dismissed them out of hand so that the dirty State lawyers wouldn't even have to argue anything.

This case will move on toward the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and beyond, on the issue of whether granting or denying access to reporters is an Administrative or Judicial Function. 

This Judge of course never once mentioned the words "Administratvie Function" in his purported analysis of the case.

And yes it is a shame that taxpayers subsidize his income as well as that of the dirty state Judge and that of his lawyers as well.... Mark Lindquist's Office is notoriously dirty, just Google it.